| This
would include most interior work, such as the heating upgrade and changes to
the lobby that your building has planned, or work that does not adversely
affect significant features of the building, such as replacing a window
lintel or a roofing membrane. Even though most interior work is not visible
from the outside, some repairs and alterations could be, which is why the
LPC requires a permit. For example, the vent of a bathroom exhaust fan could
cut through a significant decorative feature on the facade, or an interior
partition could partially block a front window. Likewise, an exterior
element of the building not on the front facade could still be visible from
a side street. The LPC would require that the proposed work in such cases be
modified so it meets applicable guidelines.
The second type of LPC approval, a Permit for Minor Work (PMW), is issued
when the proposed work will affect significant protected architectural
features but does not require a DOB permit. Examples include window or door
replacement, masonry cleaning or repair, restoring architectural details,
and refurbishing fire escapes.
The third type of permit, a Certificate of Appropriateness (C of A), is
needed when the proposed work requires a DOB permit and will affect
significant protected architectural features. (If the proposed work does not
require a DOB permit but has been denied a PMW, the owner can apply for a C
of A.) Examples of C of A work include adding or demolishing stories,
removing stoops or cornices, or any type of new construction. In these
instances, the LPC requires that a public hearing be held at which the
building owner (or a representative) presents the case for the proposed
work, and a board of LPC commissioners votes on it.
In determining whether to grant approval for a proposed renovation or
upgrade, the LPC takes into consideration whether the work will be
historically accurate to the building and/or the district where it is
located. If the property has been minimally modified from its original
design, then the renovations or repairs should match the existing character
of the building as closely as possible. If, however, the building has been
significantly modified over the years, particularly before 1965, when the
LPC was established, then the LPC may require that the proposed work restore
the building to its historical origins.
Contemporary-style buildings in historic districts, however, are not
required to alter their designs to look “old fashioned.” The LPC’s main
concern is that such recently built properties fit in with the scale and
character of the overall district. But a modern building will not be asked
to install elements of an earlier era, such as multi-paned windows, if they
were not part of the original design.
Similarly, the LPC does not require alterations be made to a property if
none are planned. For example, if a building has a highly visible and
historically inappropriate addition, such as a roof deck installed before
the property or district was landmark-protected, the LPC will not force the
owner to remove it. But if the owner plans on repairing or making changes to
the deck, then the LPC would require that the renovations make the
installation less visually intrusive and more in line with the rest of the
building and the district.
Although the LPC does not require buildings to make unplanned
alterations, it does require that owners maintain their properties so that
historical features are not lost and the building is not subject to
“demolition by neglect.” This rule is similar to the Buildings Department
requirement that all New York City buildings be maintained in a safe
condition.
Applying for a Permit
When applying for an LPC permit, the Commission will request documentation
of the existing conditions, including as-built drawings, current photos, and
photographs of the building’s historic origins (if available), as well as
plans and a written scope of work of the proposed changes. Material samples
or presentation boards may also be required. The Commission assigns a staff
member to handle each case, and he or she may suggest that the building
owner and/or its engineer or architect meet at the Commission’s office to
review the proposed changes in detail. A meeting at the property may also be
requested, and sometimes a prototype or mockup of items such as railings or
wood decks must be temporarily put in place for review.
Co-op and condo boards planning a series of frequent changes to the same
part of the building or related work that will take several years to
complete can submit a “master plan” to the LPC, establishing a building-wide
standard for future changes to specific building elements. Before beginning
the actual work, an application still must be filed identifying the work
items to be performed and showing that they will conform to the overall
plan. No drawings or public hearing will be needed, however, because the
master plan has already been approved. A master plan does not limit other
type of work—changes not part of the plan can still be proposed, but those
items would have to undergo the regular LPC review.
Objections
The LPC may object to proposed changes for a variety of reasons. For
example, if the replacement item for an ornamental element does not
accurately replicate the existing detail, or replacement windows
significantly diminish the glazing area, then the planned alterations would
have to be modified. The Commission provides guidelines for most types of
projects and lists options for approved materials and items if the proposed
work does not pass muster. In general, cementitious products, such as cast
stone, are preferred over artificial materials, and wood trim should not be
covered with vinyl or capped with metal. Some composite materials, such as
glass-fiber-reinforced concrete, may be an acceptable replacement for
decorative elements difficult to replicate in the original material, such as
terra cotta.
Boards should be aware the approval process does not happen overnight, so
the necessary documents, photos, and paperwork should be submitted as early
in the process as possible. According to the LPC, a Permit for Minor Work
takes approximately 20 working days to process, a Certificate of No Effect
30 working days, and a Certificate of Appropriateness 90 working days. The
time varies depending on the number and type of changes being proposed and
whether a visit to the site is necessary. Revising proposed alterations to
address LPC objections will also add time to the approval process.
Formerly there weren’t any fees associated with obtaining an LPC permit.
But in July 2004, the DOB started collecting fees on behalf of the
Commission. LPC permit fees range from $50 to several hundred dollars,
depending on the construction cost of the project. (This cost is in addition
to the DOB’s own filing fees.) However, there are no LPC fees if a DOB
permit is not required, such as with a Permit for Minor Work.
Keep in mind that most repair and renovation projects on landmark
properties or those located in historic districts will require LPC approval.
Even something as simple as removing a fabric awning requires a permit, so
before beginning work it’s best to check with your engineer or architect or
directly with the LPC (www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/lpc) to make sure your building
complies. In addition, boards should inform residents and commercial tenants
that the building is subject to landmark laws and that all individual
apartment alterations need to be approved before the work begins.
LPC regulations do add another layer of paperwork to repair and upgrade
projects, but landmark protection plays a valuable role in preserving New
York City’s historical and architectural character.
More Ask the Engineer
articles |